View source

Seems like mostly ass-kissing. No one bothered to mention that he's obviously a fatass. A fatass with actual intelligence, but still a fatass. [[User:HedgeJew|HedgeJew]] 19:08, 31 January 2008 (CST)
* plz to add haet then.  i understand it being soft though as, unlike some [[Splongcat|others]], this guy seems to be a more genuine hero of the revolution, so to speak. [[User:DCY|<font color="blue"><font-style: "Estrangello Edessa"><big><big>> < y</big></big></font></font>]] <font color="black"><sup><small>▪</small></sup></font>[[User talk:DCY|<SPAN STYLE="font-family: Trajan Pro;"><font color="blue"><sup><small>talk</small></sup></font>]]</SPAN><font color="black"><sup><small>▪ </small></sup></font> [[Image:Star of David.gif|25px]] 19:39, 31 January 2008 (CST)

** Haet added.  All I could think of is his [[Shameless self promotion]] and the whoring out of his DVDs. [[User:Chunkmunky|Chunkmunky]] 15:25, 1 February 2008 (CST)
* anon liek wise beard man - [[User:Serious Cat|Serious Cat]] 01:29, 7 February 2008 (CST)

* Ebaums World approves of this fatass. [[User:Fishpaw|Fishpaw]] 09:32, 7 February 2008 (CST)
* Let it be soft, at least until Anonymous gets over the postcoital bliss of Raeping Scientology. Lulz at the expense of fatasses comes later. -- [[Image:Jigsaw_puzzle_piece.png]] [[User:Jigsaw|<sup>For every piece</sup>]]<span style="position: relative; left: -53px; margin-right: -53px;  text-decoration:none;">[[User_talk:Jigsaw|<sub>there is a puzzle</sub>]]</span> 11:37, 23 February 2008 (CST)

wise beard man = [[God]] --[[User:El ron|El ron]] 04:54, 26 February 2008 (CST)

I can't help but notice the severe case of [[Asperger's Syndrome]] this entire article has. Is this what Anon has come to? - [[User:Joreal Conners|Joreal Conners]] 05:41, 28 June 2008 (CDT)

==Suspended!==
Wise beard man's Youtube account has been suspended once again!<br>
http://forums.enturbulation.org/15-breaking-news/man-harpoons-again-xenutv1-channel-youtube-suspended-9726/
[[User:Infinitix|Infinitix]] 19:17, 17 April 2008 (CDT)

==EPIC==
Genius, what a guy, its men like him that make me happy to be a...thetan...trapped in a person, or whatever. :) O wise Beard! Darat lux nobis! :) [[User:Andronicus|Andronicus]] 13:21, 14 February 2008 (CST)

== WRRRRYYYYY ARE YOU PROMOTING HIM? ==
Hes an massive faggot who should be killed with and should die by a heart-attack. I propose we turn this pro-fatass into anti-fatass. Or else go back 315chan or something. {{unsigned|Lawlzy}}
* OMG BAWWWWWWW!  Jesus fucking christ, ED is not /i/, ED is not /b/, so just fucking deal with it. YES, he is a fatass, this is mentioned, but LIVE WITH IT. ED doesn't care about the battle between moralfags and oldfags. [[User:Burkaburka|Burkaburka]] -  [[User_talk:Burkaburka|piss off]] 10:58, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
** Burka is 100% right.  The encyclopedia exists to document things, not take sides and turn articles into unfunny propaganda. Go whine somewhere else.  If you touch this article after the ban wears off, you'll be getting a permanent vacation from ED. {{User:WhiteMystery/autosig}}
*** I second WhiteMystery's notion. I mean, if ED WAS completely pro-chan (as opposed to pro-lulz) the 4chan article would be pretty much a vanity page. Besides, Wise Beard is an awesome troll. He's been debating with Scifags for a long time, and consistently putting them in intellectual checkmate, no less; and IMHO, trolls that win because they genuinely outsmart their foe, rather than dump truckloads of copypasta on them are A++ in my book. [[User:HedgeJew|HedgeJew]] 12:04, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
**** Where the fuck are the lulz in this article? The internet has been at war with Scientology for a long time, and it was as unfunny in 1995 as it is in 2008 (unless watching self-righteous nerds butt heads with a self-righteous cult is your idea of hilarity, that is). This guy is just another fat, unlulzy moralfag, and his groupies should e-fellate him elsewhere on their own time. LULZ, OR GTFO --[[User:Netparrot|Netparrot]] 01:56, 7 May 2008 (CDT)
*****[[Image:Bawwwww_bunny.jpg]]
:::::--[[User:Drunkenlazybastard|Drunkenlazybastard]] 02:16, 7 May 2008 (CDT)

== Behave scientologists! ==
WBM - the beard that launched 9000 internetz

==note to youtube : "Previously the church of scientology was banned for ToS violations. One of their videos was located at ?v=XCB0HkaH0oU The Church of Scientology now has a paid account at youtube.com/ChurchofScientology - How much is YouTube's account restoration fee? I am interested in starting a collection to restore xenutv1 and would like to know my target."==

^ copypasta title from forums (ie not me)

scientology has a previously banned account.  anonymousfacts banned for revealing personal information.
WMB got his account banned because he had a previous account that had been suspended.

below is a copypast from [http://forums.enturbulation.org/15-breaking-news/scilon-youtube-channel-page-ranking-push-11532/9/ enturbulation]
{{User:Zenophile808/sig}} 20:15, 29 April 2008 (CDT)
contacts:

editor@youtube.com

suggestions@youtube.com

legal-support@google.com

copyright@youtube.com

estreich@youtube.com

650-343-2960
650-253-0000


also from [http://forums.enturbulation.org/7-general-discussion/new-violator-notify-youtube-11703/ this]

Youtube tries very hard to hide these email addresses, but hell hath no fury like Anonymous scorned.
editor@youtube.com
editors@youtube.com
service@youtube.com
suggestions@youtube.com
ads@youtube.com
legal-support@google.com
streamsfeedback@youtube.com
rss@youtube.com
estreich@youtube.com
mrd@youtube.com
copyright@youtube.com
ukcopyright@youtube.com
activesharingfeedback@youtube.com
filmz@youtube.com
citizentube@youtube.com
audioswapfeedback@youtube.com
security@youtube.com
howto@youtube.com
citizensteve@youtube.com
comedy@youtube.com

Alternative format (but same addresses as above). It might be convenient to copy/paste this string in the address section of most email programs:

editor@youtube.com; editors@youtube.com; service@youtube.com; suggestions@youtube.com; ads@youtube.com; legal-support@google.com; streamsfeedback@youtube.com; rss@youtube.com; estreich@youtube.com; mrd@youtube.com; copyright@youtube.com; ukcopyright@youtube.com; activesharingfeedback@youtube.com; filmz@youtube.com; citizentube@youtube.com; audioswapfeedback@youtube.com; security@youtube.com; howto@youtube.com; citizensteve@youtube.com; comedy@youtube.com


NY Post article: Church spokesperson confirms that Scientology made the ToS violating videos and did put them on Youtube- TOM'S CHURCH COUNTERATTACKS - New York Post


To Whom It May Concern:

I’m sure you are receiving many comments on this today but I figured I would be one more voice in the chorus. Back in March, the user “Anonymous Facts” was banned for posting videos revealing personal information and slandering them by calling them terrorists, violating YouTube’s ToS.

Through this article in the New York Post the user name “Anonymous Facts” can be linked to the Church of Scientology:

TOM'S CHURCH COUNTERATTACKS - New York Post
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03152008/gossip/pagesix/toms_church_counterattacks_101990.htm

A few key quotes from the article:

“But now the church has counterattacked by posting YouTube videos under the title, "Anonymous Facts," detailing the death threats from Anonymous and identifying its members, who are labeled "terrorists" although they look more like frat boys. “

“The narrator goes on and on, then names men they claim are members of the group.”

” A spokesperson for the Church of Scientology said, "We absolutely made the videos."

The reason this is coming up now is the Church of Scientology released a press release recently promoting their new YouTube channel YouTube - ChurchofScientology's Channel

This would be a non-issue except that YouTube banned long time Scientology critic Mark Bunker’s account (XenuTV1) because a previous account he had (XenuTV) had been banned due to violating the ToS. Please note that XenuTV1 in no way violated the YouTube ToS. It was merely the fact that he had a previous banned account that resulted in the second account being banned. That was the policy stated to him at the time of his banning, 1 account banned means all accounts banned, regardless of if the individual accounts violate the ToS or not. This was accepted and we moved on until it came to my and others attention that Scientology is violating the same rule.

With that in mind, I respectfully request that YouTube remove the channel found at YouTube - ChurchofScientology's Channel , as they say, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If it is truly the policy of YouTube that any user with a banned account can not operate additional accounts then that policy should hold true regardless of who that person or organization is.

I understand that there will be complications with this issue as the Church of Scientology is currently paying for that channel but the linked article clearly shows that “Anonymous Facts” was not an individual but the Church of Scientology acting as a corporate entity, and therefore should be treated as any other YouTube user in this case. I would be disappointed to find out that one can circumvent the rules laid down on the average YouTube user if enough money is on the line. I look forward to your response.

Thank you,

== Guys, Mark Bunker is not that great. ==

All the Moralfags just adore this guy. But Moralfags are lame. All Mark Bunker does is fuck around with Scientology, which most people don't really give a shit about. If Mark Bunker ever found out what Anonymous REALLY does, he'd probably hate the Moralfags that still support him. --[[User:Orly44|Orly44]]
::::Bunker is in fact awesome. but the goal of this article is trivial. the point of this article to make fun of his lack of notability. regardless, Bunker is a good guy - but i agree with you Orly over all  [[User:Weatherman|Weatherman]] 22:00, 9 August 2008 (CDT)

== SLANDER... y/n? ==

yeah, so this guy turned countless anon into boring moralfag dweebs. i'd like to fag up his page a bit, but alas i ph33r the b&hammer. --[[User:Blackfish711|Blackfish711]] 18:15, 30 August 2008 (CDT)
::::As long as you don't constantly cross things out and go "HAHA DISREGARD THAT I SUCK COCKS" over and over again, I don't think anyone [[Shit nobody cares about|Gives a shit]]. --[[User:Orly44|Orly44]] 02:27, 31 August 2008 (CDT)

== LOL!!!111!!1!11oneoneoneone  ==

Oh that is so funny i almost (did) crapped myself. Its so original chuck norris jokes with WBM instead of chuck norris. Hey if you think THAT is funny there is this super neat new site that nobody knows about but it's the best in the world its called Gaia Online. [[User:Fireass|Fireass]] 22:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)