View source

== Redux ==
Saved from deletion, shortened, shit gotten rid of.  Thoughts?

--[[User:Gank]] <sub><font color="orange">[[User_talk:Gank|talk]]</font></sub> 15:45, 7 June 2008 (CDT)


== 9/11 Image ==
Whats not funny?
* The fact that it sucks. It's a poor use of [[MS Paint]] and it draws the eye away from the funnier, classic image. --[[User:Bastardman|Bastardman]] 02:17, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)

*Then do a better one then prick, no one else would disagree with it. --[[User:Sharkcheater|Sharkcheater]] 03:06, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)
*# Most of your edits have been unfunny. 
*#Don't talk that way to an admin, unless you have a thing for the [[banhammer]]. --[[User:Ntg85|Ntg85]] 03:24, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)
** Read what I said again. It doesn't need two images. The other one just fucks it up. Articles always end up looking like shit when people add to many images to them. And btw, [[The Internet Is Serious Business|SERIOUS MOTHERFUCKING BUSINESS]]. --[[User:Bastardman|Bastardman]] 14:37, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)

*Okay so some have been funny. That alone should get you off my back I'm sure there's cock holes worse tha me on this shit XD! I'm fine with your decision. But other people have told me its funny (isn't crappy [[MS Paint]] ) I also agree to many Pix would fuck an article up. Maybe after a lot more is written?--[[User:Sharkcheater|Sharkcheater]] 21:22, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)

== X on a Y ==

[[TOOW]] much?-[[User:Thedreadedkettle|<font color="#000088">Ket</font>]]--[[User talk:Thedreadedkettle|<font color="#008800">Talk to me</font>]] 09:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

== Thoughts ==
This article completely fails to mention that this movie was, in large part, a product of internet interest and had a huge following/development on the 'net. If I'm not mistaken, the name was leaked on the internet initially as an attempt to keep the working title rather than the more mundane titles the producers were pondering. From there, it exploded, and became a huge internet phenomenon but subsequently tanked at the box office because everyone knew the idea blew. The article must be here, it would be probably the most internet-relevant movie article we have (a few possible exceptions aside). - [[User:Jasper|Jasper]] 15:38, 7 June 2008 (CDT)
* Me thinks you've trimmed too much. The X on a Y thing was too long and stupid before, but some of it might be worth keeping. I think this page belongs here but it is still a shit stub, and now its even stubbier. I think it needs a whole rewrite to be honest, its just pure snark and nothing clever. I hate to sound like an 8th grade english teacher, but I can't even tell if you've seen the movie from the article, and that sucks. -[[User:Ezrahalogen|Ezrahalogen]] 15:44, 7 June 2008 (CDT)

=Re-Direct=

Why does Samuel L. Jackson re-direct here? He has a lot of internet drama outside of this movie (like all the fights talking about Pulp Fiction starts), and I heard he bullies his pundits IRL. We should start a page about him... -[[User:Black_Sonata|Black_Sonata]] 20:38, 19 September 2008 (CDT)


=Monkey fighting snakes on this monday to friday plane=

I think this video should be added

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4t6zNZ-b0A