The Wikipedia Review
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
The Wikipedia Review is a hivemind of kook anti-Wikipedia message boards dedicated to obsessing over SlimVirgin criticizing the even more lame and cuckoo and evil Wikipedia. Its various incarnations are frequented by Wikipedia trolls who engage in lame flame wars with the Wikipedia critics, a microcosm of Wikipedia's e-evil.
Generally, a bunch of morons who talk about how people waste their lives on Wikipedia, never getting that they are wasting their lives by watching other people waste their lives. When someone on Colbert Nation wrote that "Because the only thing dorkier than Wikipedia, is a website dedicated to exposing the inner workings of Wikipedia" that that Colbert Nation just said what losers they are, but the WRetards laughed with their collective 110 IQ as if it was a hit on TOW[1]. Not the brightest bunch, and as recently as October 2009 their fruitcake kingpin Somey continued to admit he harvests the IP information of people who come to the site.[2] But what do people without lives have to hide?
Winston Churchill once said that for every action there is equal and opposite criticism. Thus, one would expect Wikipedia Review to be a giant horde of knowledge-hating book-burning self-righteous hare-brainers who never quite got over losing WW2. But, disappointingly, only about 40 people worldwide could fit the requirements mentioned above, and form the Wikipedia Review community.
Still, despite the differences on the surface, Wikipedia Review is mostly a reflection of Wikipedia's own Web-fuckery.
Contents |
Members and drama
Wikipedia Review is, as should be expected of any site criticizing Wikipedia, full of Nazis and trolls who frequently libel and defame lame-ass Wikipedia contributors. Or at least, that's what we read on Wikipedia. Yes, many of the prominent members on Wikipedia Review are or soon will be perma-banned from Wikipedia, since Wikipedia doesn't believe in criticism unless they've previously approved of what that criticism might be. Wikipedia's policy towards critics in general is typified by this.
Of course, the fact that most of the Wikipedia Review folks are not particularly... um... stable may also contribute a little to WR members being treated like cockroaches. Sometimes it's hard to tell whether this comes from the illnesses itself or from the medications, but confessions like "I am also very aggressive right now and very delusional" from Blissyu2, aka Zordac, aka aka aka aka aka certainly many a other persona, indicate some major players at Wikipedia Review may be fucking batshit insane.
If you think that lo-o-o-o-ng and voluminous trollcasts from those who are batshit insane at Wikipedia Review are shunned, think again. They are actually very much liked among the site's many trolls, since delusional people "often think in non conventional ways and pick up on interesting things".[3] (One can't make this stuff up!)
As important as reviewing Wikipedia may be, at least a considerable number at the site appear much more in need of a psychological review.
The Wikipedia Jews
It has been well documented that Wikipedia has a Jew problem. Wikipedia Jews like Grace Note have repeatedly tried to take over The Wikipedia Review, fortunately without success. The Wikipedia Jews try to discredit The Wikipedia Review by using their political correctness and labeling the entire Wikipedia Review as Nazis, neo-Nazis and anti-Semites. Of course, the fact that WR attempted to sodomize every single Jew in a position of power on WP may have made the nazi-labeling job somewhat easier.
As explained by another Wikipedia Review user:
- The Wikipedia Jew clique is a problem that Wikipedia should address. Others should be aware of it too. They are merely the mirror image of a Islamofascist or Neo-nazi clique. None is good on a collaborative project with a mission to be an "encyclopedia".
- What should their clique be called, if not the "Wikipedia Jews"? Come up with something better.
If you even think of suggesting "Jewish WP editors", you'll be sent recht to the gaz champers.
History
Forum schizophrenia
Wikipedia Review was initially hosted on shitty Proboards, and run by an admin who went by the name "Igor Alexanderbergstein". At least 100 years ago, SlimVirgin secretly spread false rumors that Igor was a neo-nazi holocaust denier known as Alex Linder, and so Grace Note believed and went batshit. Igor, who was actually Jewish, up and banned fucking everyone and posted the truth about the Holocaust. When questioned about his actions, Igor responded, "I did it for the lulz". (srsly, Ignor's grandfather died in the concentration camps). Nonetheless, the forum caught schizophrenia from its major contributors and "split-off" to a separate server, where it was operated by one Mistress Selina Kyle.
Unfortunately, MSK proved to be among the batshit insane at The Wikipedia Review. After she deleted a post that exposed the Jewish conspiracy behind Wikipedia, several members, including two admins Blu Aardvark and Sgrayban, also caught schizophrenia and began work on a new forum, using the most recent MySQL backup to re-import the topics.
Mistress Selina Kyle had initially planned to file an internet lawsuit against the perpetrators for their plagiarism of the database, but another of her internal personas decided not to follow through on her other persona's threat, in part due to the fact that the second forum quickly went on anti-psychotic meds and folded within less than a week.
Last Thursday, the forum once again fell off the internets when administrator Somey accidentally tore the forum's foreskin. It was recovered this Thursday and sewn back on.
Palace coup
“Remember, remember the seventh of November,
The WR, treason and plot,
I know of no reason
Why Somey's treason
Should ever be forgot.”
This is not the first time Wikipedia Review had banned members unfairly. Malber and Amorrow were two of the best, most well-behaved members with insightful posts, and yet they were banned by the moderators.
But on November 5th, 2007, (seriously, November 5th) after another round of paying Wikipedia Review's hosting and domain bills, Blissyu2 got in an internet argument with moderator "Kato" over irrelevant bullshit. It resulted in:
- Somey changing's Blissyu2 password and banning him from the site
- Blissyu2 saying WR moderator Nathanr was his friend for 12 years who betrayed him and permahating him even after Nathanr now says WR betrayed him and he's no longer a mod.
- Blissyu2 spent the next year telling everyone Somey stole the WR domain an website from him, even this guy.
For the later, Blissyu2, operating from Australia without a driver's license and virtually no money whatsoever, was unable to easily prove he was who even though he spent billions of Australian dollars equivalent to $0.17 American per million (though now that the US dollar collpased it's the other way around). However, Somey simply paid for Hostgator to host Wikipedia Review instead of Lunarpages, but neglected to tell anyone. It was a win-win situation for everyone concerned. Lunarpages got paid for nothing, while Hostgator got a new customer. The only loser was Blissyu2, as it effectively stole the account from him. Basically, they moved from one hosting service known by everyone to suck [4] [5] to another one also known by everyone to suck [6].
The fieryangel v. David Shankbone
See also:The fieryangel and Muzak Faggits
The Wikipedia Review was pwned by the drama once again in 2008 when the notorious self-promoter and Wikipedia Pornographer David Shankbone showed his ugly muzzle on the board. The Fieryangel was outraged as he had been banned for spamming his business all over Wikipedia, while Shankbone had received many barnstars for uploading thousands of gay porn pictures with "by David Shankbone" in the file name.
After weeks of Shankbone and The Fieryangel crapflooding the Review with hundreds of childish insults, Shankbone finally cut to the chase and outed the FieryAngel as Musikfabrik, an account shared by pig bottom Paul and his boyfriend Jean-Faggy, owners of shit art company Muzak Faggits. Even Somey knew TFA was the Muzak Fagits - he said so in the WR's sooper seekrit forum, pointing out that the Muzak Fagits only used three IP addresses the entire time they had been on WR. Somey promptly gave David a ninety day unpaid vacation for the lulz. However for reasons best know to himself (most likely petty revenge), Jorge leaked screenshots of Review administrators releasing users private information. In a futile effort at damage control Somey deleted the sooper seekrit thread from April 12, but it was too late...
Wikipedia Review Anti-Lulz: SCANDAL SCANDAL SCANDAL!!! The Nazis Spy On Their Own Members!
(if you want to see the raw text rather than screen shots, click here [7])
God damn turns out them niggaz the Wikipedia Review is anti-lulz, maybe even worst than the bureaucratic fucks at TOW! Remember when Daniel Brandt fagged-out Newyorkbrad at zee Hivemind? Turnz out dat it wasn't Brandt going around looking at photos on New York fag firms for photoz of dat Fat Jew! It twas SOMEY!!!! Somey been spyin' something fierce on the freedom fighters of WR - keeping tracks of their IP addresses and sharing them wit duh wrong people... Now, I dun know bout all a Jew, but I'd be might damn pazizzled at the WikiNazi Review for fucking around with privacy. And dem top guys--Kato The Old Fucking Jap, Somey The Neo Nazi, Daniel "Fuck-Yo-Privacy" Brandt, Greg Hoser, Jorge the Arab Fag: THEY ALL BE SPYIN AND SHARIN!!!! WHAT DUH FUCK!?
*DANIEL BRANDT:If this leads to a fix on his real name, I'm willing to hold off on Hivemind for 30 days to obscure the source."
- SOMEY:"This is a promise, right? I'm thinking it should be more like 45 days, or else just quietly drop the whole thing - if something like this were to get out, we'd lose a substantial amount of credibility over the whole 'cyberstalking' issue. But you know that I, for one, trust you - Gawd help me for doing so. So yes: get him.
Now I sez: GOT DAMN!!! Themz some assholes - check out duh images to duh bottom - and see!!!!
SHIT IS ANTI-LULZ
 Daniel Brandt and Somey spying on Newyorkbrad - turns out Brandt didn't search law firm photos - nice for the big privacy ad-vo-hypocrate. |
 More Wikipedia Review Anti-Lulz Faggotry |
 And mo...got damn niggaz. |
 AND MO - SPYIN ON DEY OWN MEMBAHS! |
October 2009: "And We're still spyin' - yeah yeah yeah"
On a thread about TOW cabal-approved Benjiboi, Somey talks openly about how he still harvests the IP address information of his members:
 "Lookin' through the records of all you dumbasses who log in, I sees that none of yous been on that IP (none of yous I'll discuss - bahahaha) |
OMG CyberTerrorism!!!
Due to the Wikipedia Review running on software that was new when Windows 95 was considered the ne plus ultra of the computing world, the site was hacked by unknown and obviously skilled hacker in June 2008. On June 3rd, Internet terrorists were allowed to compromise the Review because the administrators hadn't updated their WordPress ever. Anyone visiting the site and stupid enough to be using Internet Explorer enjoyed an attempted infection by an ActiveX downloader virus. Ironically, the people most distressed by the downtime were Wikipedia administrators apparently upset that they were no longer getting gossip about each other.
The second assault on June 23rd, was an old-fashioned DOS attack from Russia that put the Review over its monthly CPU usage limit, causing their host to pull the plug. Once again, the Review sailed off the Internet into oblivion. The leading suspects are either SlimVirgin, Raul654, or Blissyu2 ineptly trying to regain control of the forum he supposedly "owns."
There are no girls on the internet
On 6 September 2008, all hell broke loose on The Review as the person who had won the title of "most unfair ban eva", Poetlister, was proven to be actually a guy, and all of his accounts were proven to be the same person all along, as had been proven by EDiots a year earlier, and of course since 2005 SlimVirgin had been saying that they were all the same person (although SlimVirgin outdid WR's over-reaction by claiming that Poetlister was secretly a neo nazi sent to destroy all of Jewkind!) But, in true Review style, rather than admit that they were wrong, instead Reviewers spent a record 70 pages congratulating themselves over the whole issue, all the while trying to bury the people who had actually known it and said it all along, such as Blissyu2 who had been saying it ever since ED's proof in September 2007. Whilst congratulating themselves on a job well done, they seemed to miss the point somewhat, suggesting a wide range of conspiracy theories, ranging from "Poetlister is the real reason that Kato got The Fieryangel banned" through to "The whole reason that we have hated SlimVirgin or even Wikipedia as a whole is because of this Poetlister lie". Actually, Poetlister did the same thing that most everyone has done since the internet began - he created female accounts so as to live out a gay fantasy and/or to manipulate men. The actual reason that we are supposed to be upset is a potential case for libel, based around him using a real person's photos associated with a love of BDSM and various other nasty actions (as Taxwoman). In typical Review style, though, they massively over-reacted, trying so hard to pretend that they hadn't had egg on their face for a year, and that they should have trusted the hard evidence presented on ED a year earlier, that they totally missed the point. Daniel Brandt even went so far as to claim that Poetlister was a secret agent whose aim was to oppose SlimVirgin's secret agent status! Oh dear. Oh dear.
See also
External links
 |
The Wikipedia Review is part of a series on Wikipedia |
| Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage. |
![[2]](http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:Somey_Still_Spyin_Yeah_Yeah.JPG){kind=link}