User talk:HRWiki Guy

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Wow, Are you gonna stick around and edit here?

• Ban. User appears to have edited Homestar Runner in an entirely un-lulzy way. --Harish Rallapali 03:32, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • he changed one word. i'm amused. --kh/ what 05:45, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I changed it because that's what 'S.T.U.F.F' stands for. Select, not Spot. Just a minor mistake I'm trying to correct. HRWiki Guy 19:54, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Yes, but we thrive on minor mistakes.--hardvice (talk) 23:02, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • You found ED on the internet, went through the process of registering an account, changed ONE small, small mistake that wasn't really a mistake or even relevant, and contine to check back here? Where do you find your significance in life? --Harish Rallapali 05:22, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Lamest Latest Edit

HRWiki Guy sed:

Wow. This Wiki Sucks. You Cocksuckers. It's Like... The Wasteland Of The Internet. Shouldn't People That Frequent This Place Be Out... 
Stalking People? Other Men Perhaps? You Gay Bastards.

• It's funny cuz like half the mods here are total 'mos IRL. Also, don't you think you might possibly be overreacting to a one-word edit on a site that's not even directly related to your fetish pet website? I'm betting the mighty heterosexual HRWiki Guy has a plush Marzipan that he yiffs mercilessly while wearing his homemade Homestar fursuit. This makes me laugh, and oh hey! That's kind of the point of the site. THANK YOU FOR CONTRIBUTING TO THE LULZ.--hardvice (talk) 10:07, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Do you find truth offensive? Do you shy away from anything correct, normal, and sane? Or would you rather just incite anarchy and chaos across the web, net, and world? It's folks like you that give this world a bad name. HRWiki Guy 10:12, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • You DO realize this site is just a humorous parody of other Internet stuff, right?--hardvice (talk) 10:13, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Yea, but who's to say that humor to one person is humor to all? Perhaps I find truth humorous. Then shouldn't I be allowed to keep my one word of truth amidst this web of lies? HRWiki Guy 10:15, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
        • Perhaps you do, find the truth humorous. You'd be the only one though. Nobody finds the absolute humor and context of anything funny, therefore you don't find this funny, QED. I need to make a crap article for at some point. Dr. Park N. Stones 13:12, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
        • Nope. Sorry. Try some place else.--hardvice (talk) 10:18, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
        • Also, the truth makes for really, really poor parody.--hardvice (talk) 10:26, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
          • Just give him a break. It's one word, ; the entire wiki doesn't have to have an episode. --HRWikiguy4
            • On the other hand, it's fun to fuck with him. He's so incapable of allowing anything less-than-completely flattering about his precious Wiki to stand. I mean, seriously, this is one of the most fun Wikiedit dramas we've had, and it's all over one word. How gay do you have to be to get this worked up over one word? Answer: as gay as HRWikiguy4. And that's pretty damn gay.--hardvice (talk) 20:08, 28 Jun 2005 (UTC)

huh

what the fuck is this page full of red faggotry? --kh/ what 13:16, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)