BUY A SHIRT!
The ED TShirt Shop is open for business! Use discount code ED2009 for 10% off! Click here to shop.
ED5 Pollfest is going on now! Register a forums accounts and help us find the best article in the five year history of Encyclopedia Dramatica. Check out the four polls running today: [1] [2] [3] [4]



User talk:Dracula

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

Redlinks look like Britney Spears!!

Contents

Awe!

That's a great article on John Best Junior! What a LOSER! Butthurt!! DickDoodle 01:09, 4 November 2007 (CDT)

Phil's world edit

I didn't revert the edit entirely. If Timelord did try to sue Foresam then it is relevant to the article. I just removed anything that could appear as self-promotion in the Foresam line. --SuperMonkeyMan 14:25, 10 January 2008 (CST)

article thing

Because they aren't the same thing. It's kind of along the same lines as GoddessMine and Julie Abra Fischer. They both cover the same drama but they cover the two aspects of the drama. In this case, Phil's world is where drama began. Flardox came from Phil's World and brought more drama. So the flardox article would cover all of the drama up until now with Phil's World documenting the events before the drama. The article isn't that great, true. However it is ground-zero for the flardox saga. --SuperMonkeyMan 20:29, 12 January 2008 (CST)

It doesn't matter now if the Phil's World article is crap or not. Since it was blanked in a fit of nerd rage the lulziest thing that can be done is to keep it from becoming blanked again or made crappier by an edit. Once the flardox page is up, the Phil's World article should have a notice pointing to the flardox article for the drama. The Phil's World page would act only as background info (which is needed to show that Timelord as well as the people who edit that wiki are batshit insane).

I don't care who edits the article. As long as there is drama and lulz, it shouldn't matter who is adding it. --SuperMonkeyMan 20:52, 12 January 2008 (CST)

Dracula v. teh Joeker

I'll be looking into this after I'm done watching Colbert. --Image:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifOldDirtyBtardImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifWUT? 16:29, 4 February 2008 (CST)

Dracula vs Joeker

Hey, I think that ODB is super busy IRL currently, so let me see if I can be of some help. I'm posting this on both of your pages, but please respond on my talk page. I looked through both of your edit histories and you've both had some good and bad edits. I see where you're conflicting and why. But honestly, it's been a while since there were any problems, and you guys seem to be coexisting just fine. You both seem like reasonable people that are here to contribute to the lulz, and that's a good thing.

I'd like to see you both stay and continue to contribute. Based on how much you guys have been talking, it certainly looks to me like you want the same thing. There are some other editors on here that I find unfunny and I don't feel like their edits really help anything, but they're doing the wrong thing for the right reason, and so I let them be and try to help them when I feel like I can.

Neither of you will get banned and I don't think that either of you is at fault in this. You had a clash of personalities and that sort of thing happens. It's up to you guys to choose to work on seperate things on site or to try and coordinate your edits so that you're both happy with the final product. WhiteMystery

  • All I'm asking is for you two to be civil. As you said, he hasn't done much for a month, so may not be coming back for any actual editing and all of this is moot. While I agree that using ED as a personal army sucks, I don't share the opinion that it warrants a ban right away. Some of the best contributors to this site started out on bad terms or by making mistakes. If we had just banned them instead of trying to work with them, we'd be out some great content right now.
With regards to the pain series you just put on his user page, that wasn't exactly what I meant by you two coming to a compromise. I removed it and do me a favor and don't put it up again. If you can't be nice for the sake of being nice, you keep talking about bans - being unfunny isn't bannable, but reverting a sysop's edits will get you a nice vacation. WhiteMystery
  • He had nothing to do with that edit. It was me because it doesn't help get things resolved. WhiteMystery
  • I seriously don't give a shit about your various reasons for not liking him. The ONLY thing that matters right now is you being civil to each other. Also, I see that you've been blocked indefinitely twice and only allowed back on site when indefinite bans were being cleared en masse. If you aren't willing to try being civil, I'll just ban you again and I don't think anyone is going to mind. WhiteMystery
  • Thank you. I'll make sure that he realizes that it's up to him at this point to keep things civil if he chooses to come back. WhiteMystery

Your wish is granted

I just created an article on Flardox. Still needs work, but it's there for your lulz and everyone else's. Creationist 05:33, 12 February 2008 (CST)

Tough Loev

Joeker vs. Dracula

I'm sending this same message to both of you!

I've been busy with the pwning of Co$ so I've not yet had a chance to look into whatevar you two are having a gaylord slap-fight over, but I'm just going to say CUT IT OUT!. Just let it go and carry on contributing your best to ED without stupid grade-school spats.

I'm wiping the slate clean between you two, sealing your 'criminal records'. I will keep track of your interactions without taking past history into consideration and whoevar fucks up first gets a wallop form my banhammer that will result in lifetime b&.

If you can't be fellow EDiots united in a common cause -the pursuit of lulz- then just agree to disagree and be gents (or ladies) about it; ignore each other and come to me for a verdict should edit woaring get either of you staemed. The stellar EDiot -like a Buddhist- will take the high road and attain EPIC WIN by walking away from faggotry.

Kthxbye. <3 --Image:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifOldDirtyBtardImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifWUT? 13:53, 12 February 2008 (CST)

Thanks!

Appreciate the seal, dude! Mythbuster 21:01, 31 May 2008 (CDT)

Srsly?

I'm not Joe. I don't have an issue with you. Don't put sockpuppet shit on my usertalk page pl0x. kkthx. Kilroy8675309 did the faggot thing and didn't sign! It ain't rocket science!

Kk. I fucked up with the tildas. Been gone for a while. But the burden of proof does not lie with me to prove I'm not Joe just because I'm familiar with him. Jesus, I figured the two of you just got into a shitfit with each other because that's what EDiots do, but now I see that it's 'cause you're a giant flaming retard who doesn't know when to quit.

Didn't the mods tell you to stop harassing each other anyway? Show some respect for authority. Kilroy8675309 02:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Oh hai, just checked in on my account, saw there was some bullshit going on. Yeah, no, I'm Joeker. If you want to BAWWWWW, just ask the Admins to check our IPs against each other to make sure we're not using the same IP. Well, if you really are that paranoid. I thought this shit was over with, but if you want to keep pushing it, I'm not going to rise to your bait. Go poil some shrimp on the barbie, would you? Toodles. Joeker 09:11, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Cripes I hate to think what he'd do if I was really baiting him......Toodles yerself buttman. Over and out. Dracula 11:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Link to this