Talk:Illogicopedia
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
hmh... i am a proud member of illogicopedia. i have one thing to say, AT LEAST ILLOGICOPEDIANS KNOW THEY ARE ACTING LIKE RETARDS!.......unlike you guys. —The preceding comment was added by Grapes, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
- Do you guys not even know how to sign your posts? My god. --Lateral 18:56, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
- I went to Illogicopedia and clicked "Randumb page" (fail.). I was greeted with this well thought out page: jet are a too thigs: airplane or musik band. the musik baned is laud and i think anoying but daddy lieks it especially when he's with jennifer. You guys obviously fail horribly. It's not funny, it's not "SO BIZARRE THAT IT'S WACKY!". It's just lame. Bai2u. (lol omg)
- As much as it hurts to include Uncyclopedia, compare articles from ED, Uncyclopedia, and Illogicopedia on stuff like "Adolf Hitler", "George Bush", etc... The George Bush page on both ED and UP are long and well-written, albeit in their own styles (UP's style being gayer). Illogicopedia's version is simply... He is a person. I like cheese. Now watch this drive. Whooomp!. You can see how Illogicopedia's articles are... well, absolute shit. So anyone who is an Illogicopedia editor should become an hero. (lol omg)
- Maybe you guys are looking at the wrong articles... I know there are a lot of retarded articles on Illogicopedia and Uncyclopedia but at the same time there are plenty of funny ones. All I can find on ED is people ranting and posting perverted pictures and talking shit about people which can be funny to a certain extent, but not when the whole fucking website is based on the same crap. How can you call illogicopedia immature with the current state of your wiki? (and yes, we are immature.) Would someone PLEASE show me an actually FUNNY ED article, and preferably not a perverted one, and preferably not one based on some stupid meme. That is all. Fishalishalish 16:49, 27 September 2008 (CDT) (an Illogicopedian)
- As much as it hurts to include Uncyclopedia, compare articles from ED, Uncyclopedia, and Illogicopedia on stuff like "Adolf Hitler", "George Bush", etc... The George Bush page on both ED and UP are long and well-written, albeit in their own styles (UP's style being gayer). Illogicopedia's version is simply... He is a person. I like cheese. Now watch this drive. Whooomp!. You can see how Illogicopedia's articles are... well, absolute shit. So anyone who is an Illogicopedia editor should become an hero. (lol omg)
- Technically, Illogicopedia isn't necessarily supposed to be funny. It's goal is to be totaly random. Lulz or no lulz. NOT Kip the Dip 22:22, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
- Shit, I could just write a script with a dictionary that would create thousands of new articles and fill their contents with random sentences pulled from random google searches, displaying random inline images. Random != Funny. (lol omg) 22:31, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- Maybe not in your opinion, but apparently there is a whole genre of humor dedicated to it. Lulz. NOT Kip the Dip 15:25, 18 February 2008 (CST)
- Shit, I could just write a script with a dictionary that would create thousands of new articles and fill their contents with random sentences pulled from random google searches, displaying random inline images. Random != Funny. (lol omg) 22:31, 13 November 2007 (CST)
COCKS
Holy nigger, that site is so fucking not funny. It's like it was written by a bunch of 8 year old zimfags that think they're totally hilarious. Their site just killed my evening...Discuss.--Cunt Destroyer 09:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
