Talk:Feem
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Contents |
Hey
I want to say, feem is amazing, and has a heart of gold. In fact look at my stupid edits from over a year ago. I truly did not know feem for who feem is. Now I realize there are few about who actually are as genuine as feem, you people should take a cue. Kakama 00:57, 27 November 2008 (CST)
This article is a sonnet from WKD to feem
WKD has some kind of gay love with feem and needs to go out and tell him, ask for buttsecks, and then get gay married Hawaii. Samsara 20:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- You can't get gay married in Hawaii, only Massachusetts. --Suckit (Talk→) 20:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Huh?
WHy is this articile being de-lulled by WKD? Are the two of them like buddies or something? Miltopia 19:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- WKD got feem pregnant and they had a shotgun wedding. Samsara 22:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- The article is fine as it is. How many times do I have to explain to you rejects that not every article has to mention anal sex, shock pictures and lolol Chuck fucking Norris. Enough already, the only contributions that have been made have renedered it less funny. Stop now. Feem, likes it, sherrod likes it, everyone else likes it. It's being protected indefinitely.--WKD 23:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I think this feem article should be a featured article. Samsara 02:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Nah, people will think ED is losing iits touch if we feature an article that an admin protected because he got his feelings hurt. Miltopia 15:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Godfuckingdamn I'm getting sick of this. How fucking much of this have you not been reading, you fucking little cockmonkey? I'll spell this the fuck out to you, as you seem hellbent on getting your arse banned for being fucktarded, and this goes for all the other faggots who are sticking their nose into business that dosn't concern them. THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE WAS FUCKED UP BY OUT OF STYLE ADDITIONS MADE FOR NO LULZ REASON. THEY WERE NOT FUNNY. 2/3 OF THE BUREAUCRATS LOVED THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE. THE BUREAUCRAT WHO REQUESTED THE ARTICLE IN THE FIRST PLACE, SHERROD DI GRIPPO, WHO OWNS THE FUCKING SITE, APPROVED OF THE ARTICLE. ZEN444 ENGAGED IN THE SAME SORT OF VANDALISM THAT GETS EVERYONE ELSE BANNED. Miltopia? Shut the fuck up, your opinion dosn't count for shit and all the reasons why have been listed above. wingsnugs--WKD 20:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hahahahaha, feem is going to kill me yet again for this edit, I'm going to hide this prediction down here. It's true though.Kakama5 20:17, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
- Godfuckingdamn I'm getting sick of this. How fucking much of this have you not been reading, you fucking little cockmonkey? I'll spell this the fuck out to you, as you seem hellbent on getting your arse banned for being fucktarded, and this goes for all the other faggots who are sticking their nose into business that dosn't concern them. THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE WAS FUCKED UP BY OUT OF STYLE ADDITIONS MADE FOR NO LULZ REASON. THEY WERE NOT FUNNY. 2/3 OF THE BUREAUCRATS LOVED THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE. THE BUREAUCRAT WHO REQUESTED THE ARTICLE IN THE FIRST PLACE, SHERROD DI GRIPPO, WHO OWNS THE FUCKING SITE, APPROVED OF THE ARTICLE. ZEN444 ENGAGED IN THE SAME SORT OF VANDALISM THAT GETS EVERYONE ELSE BANNED. Miltopia? Shut the fuck up, your opinion dosn't count for shit and all the reasons why have been listed above. wingsnugs--WKD 20:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Remove quote
The ED IRC shit should be removed. It makes him seem like a likable person. This could not be farther from the truth.
Also, his actual full name along with a picture should be on this page, as they're readily available and his virgin face provides HUGE lulz.
--ExplosivoFueled 02:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)--ExplosivoFueled 02:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
i just noticed you're pretty butthurt about this --Feem 18:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
