Talk:Engineer

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

cat? Samsara 23:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Meme Overuse

Most of the text that was recently added reads like the author just stumbled upon ED: IT'S OVER 9000, EPIC LULZ, APPLY DIRECTLY TO FOREHEAD, et cetera. Jbs 18:39, 4 June 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Meme Overuse, Schmeme Overuse.

Still moar lulzier than it was before my massive overhaul.

Hell, if It's too bad I'll take out some overused memes. -User:QQQ 9.0 6/27/08

Ansatz: What we're trying to solve here is an integer programming problem; we want to maximize the objective function, f(n) = jokes/words, and the coefficients in our tableau represent the funniness of the memes. Once the solution is obtained, singular values to the the system are found and used to guide future edits to the article. It's kind of like Google except NO NIGGERS. --Jbs 12:50, 28 June 2008 (CDT)

[edit] This article is SHIT

And will never, ever be good. --Gauss 20:23, 16 July 2008 (CDT)

Agreed. There were no lulz to be had, as the entire article was TRYING TOO HARD. ShadownetNinja 21:35, 1 August 2008 (CDT)
Agree. I'm sorry I started this article in the first place. That billboard was kind of lol at the time. This article should either be deleted, dramaficated or reverted to the last version without any of this OVER 9000 unfunny shit on it. Jbs 12:05, 3 August 2008 (CDT)
Yes. this faggot should be banned for 6 years. --Lolinnernets 12:32, 3 August 2008 (CDT)
Disagree. The article could use a bit of a cleanup and removal/edit of the newb speak, but being in engineering is sort of like a club - a really shitty club, but a club nevertheless. We are the socially awkward, but we control all that you see and hear. Fear us, or we'll I-35 you. Plus, I happen to like the different engineering sections - it prevents newbs from making a section on EE or Chem-E. And they would if it weren't for this article. Trust me. --Todd_McCloud\Talk plox 13:08, 3 August 2008 (CDT)

[edit] PROTIP

Throwing the words "protip," "lulz," "teh" and "moar" all over the place will not make your article funny. Why is this shit still here? ~ Krade hi yo~ 19:25, 15 September 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Full Re-write

Live with it.

I fixord ur article, I'll work on it moar within the next few weeks, get it nice and big and full of lulzy content and pics. QQQ 9.0 23:46, 20 November 2008 (CST)

It looks like the same unfunny shit to me. --Jbs 09:49, 23 November 2008 (CST)
I second that. Too many useless links, too much UncylopediLOL111!zordTHISISSOSILLY. Author seems to think that funny + funny = OLOLOL when in fact funny + funny = Uncyc. Some content may be salvaged but the ratio lulz/words is too low atm. - ChokinOnLulz 09:05, 28 November 2008 (CST)

You baleeted Polymer Engineering from the list, my profession. Boo. Of course, I'm too lazy to fix it. --Todd_McCloud\Talk plox 00:15, 29 November 2008 (CST)

I'll be adding it back in soon, as soon as I'm finished with my app to MIT. Technically I would have to point out polymer engineers are a flavor of chemical engineer.
Also, User:Jbs and User:ChokinOnLulz look a hell of a lot like suckpuppets to me. QQQ 9.0 13:10, 1 December 2008 (CST)

The variants of engineers section is a good idea, but needs editing preferably by people in those professions. Khaefre 02:27, 9 December 2008 (CST)

Remember this IS ED, not TOW. The goal here is lulz, not factual accuracy. BTW I qualify as an EE student now. QQQ 9.0 13:41, 14 December 2008 (CST)
Personal tools

Bookmark and Share