Talk:Blockbuster

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

I'm tempted to put {{baleetplz}} on this, in accordance with Exhibit C, but.. It holds a place in troll history, even if nobody remembers the great Hey Arnold! The Movie incident.. ­- From the lulzdeck, this is Your Captain Speaking 00:05, 20 January 2009 (CST)

• What incident? Also, don't tag old/ancient articles. It's a very slippery slope. _(talk) 00:07, 20 January 2009 (CST)

• What's bad about doing so? Just for future reference thx.Klondikebar 00:12, 20 January 2009 (CST)

• Anything pre-2007 is ED Ancient History, it's just left as a courtesy. SoCash, will do. ­- From the lulzdeck, this is Your Captain Speaking 00:17, 20 January 2009 (CST)

• But, if the article is pre-2007 and is one of those "This article is perfect" articles, is it left as courtesy or because they truly are worthy?Klondikebar 00:19, 20 January 2009 (CST)

• If it says it's perfect, that's why it was left alone. In the case of this article, it was left as a courtesy because it was, at the time, a semi-known event, though it's documentation is currently nil. I'm going to see if I can remember exactly what happened, and I'll try to improve this article. ­- From the lulzdeck, this is Your Captain Speaking 00:28, 20 January 2009 (CST)
• In a nutshell, there's no point in deleting an article with 11,000+ hits that isn't an outright shitpost. If you know anything about Blockbuster, add it. _(talk) 00:24, 20 January 2009 (CST)

• Thanks for clarifying that.Klondikebar 00:28, 20 January 2009 (CST)