BUY A SHIRT!
The ED TShirt Shop is open for business! Use discount code ED2009 for 10% off! Click here to shop. ED5 Pollfest is going on now! Register a forums accounts and help us find the best article in the five year history of Encyclopedia Dramatica. For today's poll, go here! Thanks to Kale for donating $666, and he wants to remind you all to nevar forget dem towers in New York.

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

This article is just what we need to counter the lies spread by TOW. --Blargh 06:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

• That's part of the reason I decided to create it. I'm a bit tired of tow users butthurt at ED spreading false accusations without basis in fact. Of course, I also created it in response to user butthurt at TOW looking to strike back at Wikipedia, because that's really not what we're here for. And it's also for the benefit of other groups (Youtube, anyone?) who make similar claims. The article can be expanded as needed. --Blu Aardvark 07:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I approve of this page. We get too many fucktards rocking up expecting to aimlessly badmouth people without being lol, or even coherent. Our article quality slips, and we get a bad reputation. I don't like being blocked for bullshit reasons like "ED troll", lolz-Ket^{the KangaJew} 10:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
    • iawtp -- Beat me! ^{Raep me!} _{Make me feel cheap!} 22:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
      • ED is full of BLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH? Y!--ODB 08:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 viruses 2 YouTube 3 =^_^= 4 A+++ Blu 5 MySpace 6 Wikipedia's Article on This Wiki...

viruses

this is a great fucking article...can we get something in here to counter the prevalent YouTube bullshit that ED has viruses...maybe include something about "we're a business, and like any other business have no desire to assault our customers" --subseven 01:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. --Blu Aardvark 06:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• excellent....looks great --subseven 07:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

YouTube

I've added hate site and hosts CP, which seem to be the happening allegations on JewTube right now. --LOL JEWS 07:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

=^_^=

This page is a perfect blend of lulz and serious business. I approve and award you 5 intercat points. Leam 18:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

A+++ Blu

Okay, after my initial liek of this, I now luvs it and am getting it tattooed on my torso. But seriously folks...it's gonna come in really handy for me to raise our profile/funds since I can now just put the link in an email rather than having to walk/talk someone thru the entire site.

With that in mind, what do you say to making it more prominant and put it on the front page in a site notice or summit? --ODB 00:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem with that whatsoever. I couldn't think of where to link it from, but it is designed to be linked, so feel free. --Blu Aardvark 01:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

MySpace

I've put the article in our MySpazz ABOUT ME section. I've edited it a bit and have yet to h-link it to the ED pages that correspond to our pipes. I'm audi for a couple of hours and will attack it then, but for anyone who has access to the MySpazz account, I've underlined the words/phrases that I intend to link if anyone else wants to go at it. Aiiite. 3-2-1 I'm Swayze! --Li'l Mudkips 05:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• PLZ don't, ED is full of pr0n and we could be deleted for linking to it. Content/Activity Prohibited. 4. contains nudity, violence, or offensive subject matter or contains a link to an adult website. We should only link to policy pages which definitely won't have porn on them.

Wikipedia's Article on This Wiki...

...is gone. I don't know how long it's been gone for, but there's no longer an Encyclopedia Dramatica article on Wikipedia. Just figured this was worth mentioning since it was referenced and all. And bear in mind... Much like Newgrounds, Wikipedia is "everything by everyone", so a lot of their articles are probably full of inaccuracy and whatnot. ~ Not Doc Lithius(Lulz) (U)(T)(C) 00:25, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

• Yeah, we know. In fact, the lack of the article is exactly what we are referencing, in a subtle manner. Wikipedia claims that the article was removed due to a lack of reliable sources, but nobody actually believes that, not even the Wikipedophiles. It was deleted and protected out of spite, not out of any encyclopedic interest, But that's OK, it only hurts Wikipedia in the long run, after all. --Blu Aardvark 17:23, 3 September 2007 (CDT)