Christopedia

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

This article needs moar pics, details, just moar, moar, moar.
You can help by adding moar pics, details, just moar, moar, moar.

Hey!		This article isn't lulz just yet, but its coverage can spark a lollercoaster. You can help by reverting people who delete shit, and vandalizing their user pages. See this article on google? Want to add something? Join us!

Finally a wiki for the computer literate Christian Fundamentalist. Or as it claims on the site "The Christian encyclopedia that the saved can edit." Ah, there is that holier than thou attitude every wiki needs.

The day we all feared, Armageddon

This new horror the tubes have brought us is exactly what it sounds like. A place where anyone and everyone can add their own personal bias to anything. Such as this lovely article about our great leader: The Negro

Editing is limited to accounts approved by the admin XenonII. Most of the content is created by him and is usually ~~racist~~ hilarious in nature.

The site is still in it's infancy, but it's already building a small (8 registered members) ~~army~~ circle jerk of TOW style admins. Stay tuned for a lollercaust of retarded proportions.

Troll potential

The current Christopedia homepage. Well done anon, well done.

The trolling potential here is possibly limitless. As the wiki grows the lulz are predicted to grow with it. Even in the site's genesis trolling has already been committed.

WHERE IS HE?

Crapflooding material

In addition to their obvious physical differences, such as skin and eye color, facial features and hair texture, there is no denying that racial groups also differ in their behavior. All the statistics on high-school graduation rates, out-of-wedlock births, crime rates, and other behaviors regularly reveal substantial differences between Negroes and Caucasians.

Technology

Noob "raids" Christfagopedia.

The Caucasian race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren icefields. It has been responsible for the invention of the printing press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, flight, rocketry, astronomy, the telescope, space travel, firearms, the transistor, radio, television, the telephone, the lightbulb, photography, motion pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the automobile, the steam engine, railroad transportation, the microscope, computers, and millions of other technological miracles. It has discovered countless medical advances, incredible applications, scientific progress, etc. Its members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Ceaser, Napoleon, William the Conqueror, Marco Polo, Washington, Jefferson, Churchill, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Columbus, Cabot, Edison, GrahamBell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Captain Cook, Newton, Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, Da Vinci, Poe, Tennyson, and thousands upon thousands of other notable achievers.

Throughout 6,000 years of recorded history, the pure-blooded African Negro has invented nothing. Not a written language, weaved cloth, a calendar, a plow, a road, a bridge, a railway, a ship, a system of measurement, or even the wheel. He is not known to have ever cultivated a single crop or domesticated a single animal for his own use (although many powerful and docile beasts abounded around him.) His only known means of transporting goods was on the top of his hard burry head. For shelter he never progressed beyond the common mud hut, the construction of which a beaver or muskrat is capable.

Intelligence

The I.Q.'s of American Negroes are from 15 to 20 points, on average, below those of American Caucasians. These Negro\Caucasian differences have been demonstrated repeatedly by every test ever conducted by every branch of the U.S. Military, every state, county, and local school board, the U.S. Dept. of Education, etc. The same ratio of difference has held true over a 40 year period.

With an average I.Q. of 85 (meaning that, according to their uncited "study", most blacks are about as smart as Forrest Gump.), only 16% of Negroes score over 100, while half the Caucasian population does. The Negro overlap of Caucasian median I.Q.'s ranges from 10 to 25 percent, equality would require 50 percent. Negroes are 6 times as likely to have I.Q.'s of 50 to 70 which put them in the slow learner (retarded) category, while Caucasians are ten times more likely to score 130 or over (even though it's rare to score over 125, and Asians are even MORE likely to score 130 or over).

The U.S. government's PACE examination, given to 100,000 university graduates who are prospective professional or administrative civil-service employees each year (actually, it's for paralegals), is passed with a score of 70 or above by 58% of the Caucasians who take it but by only 12% of the Negroes. Among top scorers the difference between Negro and Caucasian performance is even more striking: 16% of the Caucasian applicants make scores of 90 or above, while only one-fifth of one percent of Negro applicants score as high as 90, a Caucasian/Negro success ration (ration? i can thpell) of 80/1 (that's not a ratio, that's a fraction).

Differences between Negro and Caucasian children increase with chronological age, the gap in performance being largest at the high school and college levels (Oh, gee, possibly because many blacks DON'T GO TO COLLEGE).

Caucasian/Negro I.Q. differences are constantly excused as results of environmental variations, but at least five (made up) studies that have attempted to equate socio-economic backgrounds of the two races indicate no significant change in relative results (even though a study done in South Africa proved a significant change in results based on education). As environment improves, the Negro does better but so does the Caucasian. The gap is not decreased. In fact, extensive research by DR. G.J. McGurk (a non-existent person), associate Professor of Psychology at Villanove University, reveals that the gap in intelligence between Negroes and Caucasians INCREASES where socio-economic levels of both races are raised to the middle classes.

In 1915, Dr. G.W. Ferfuson (another made-up person, unless he's a 100 year old otaku or a zombie, because a GW Ferguson DIED in 1915) took 1,000 school children in Virginia (keyword), divided them into 5 racial categories (which were...?), and tested them for mental aptitude (LOL I thought we were testing IQ, DERP!11). On average, full-blooded Negroes scored 69.2% as high as Caucasians. Three-quarter Negroes scored 73.0% as high as Caucasians. One-half Negroes scored 81.2% as high as Caucasians. One-quarter Negroes scored 91.8% as high as Caucasians. All of these Negroes lived as and considered themselves "Negroes." Their environments and "advantages" or disadvantages were exactly the same.

Results of the Army Beta test given by the U.S. Army to over 386,000 illiterate (keyword) soldiers in WWI showed Negro draftees to be "inferior to the Caucasians on all types of tests used in the Army." Additionally, tests were conducted upon pure-blooded Negroes, Mulattoes, and Quadroons. It was found that "the lighter groups made better scores." (Because studies from a racist society being performed by biased white officers in WWI is MUCH more reliable than studies done as recently as, oh say, 1998.) Studies conducted with identical twins raised apart in radically different environments provide conclusive evidence that over-all influence of heredity exceeds that of environment in a ratio of about 3 to 1.

Even when Negroes and Caucasians have the same backgrounds, in terms of family income and childhood advantages, Negroes still have average I.Q. scores 12 to 15 points lower than comparable Caucasians. This includes cases where Negro children have been adopted by Caucasian parents. Their I.Q.s may be improved by environment, but they are still closer to their biological parents than their adoptive parents (IQs don't change with environment. How well they do on tests and respond to questions changes with environment based on culture).

Equalitarian ideologists often discount I.Q. test results with the excuse that they are culturally biased (Nice job repeating yourself). Nonetheless, NO ONE, not the NAACP (A non-profit mostly concerned with affirmative action and not IQ tests), nor the United Negro College Fund (Because a non-profit organization whose goal is to provide financial aid is going to focus on making IQ tests), nor NEA (National Endowment for the Arts?) had been able to develop an intelligence test which shows Negroes and Caucasians scoring equally.

American Indians, who often live in conditions far worse than American Negroes during their entire lives (because generalizations are completely valid in a supposedly scientific debate), still consistently outscore them on I.Q. tests.

The offspring of interracial (apparently not including Asians, Hispanics, or American Indians) "marriages" (LOL NEGROES AREN'T PEOPLE) tend to have lower I.Q.s than the Caucasian parent (Duh, because IQ isn't genetic. A genius could have an autistic kid regardless of his IQ).

The Negro brain

Numerous studies have been made of the comparative weight of Caucasian and Negro brains with results that fell within the range of about an 8-12 percent lower weight for the Negro brain. Such studies have been conducted by Bean, Pearl, Vint, Tilney, Gordon, Todd, and others.

In addition to the difference in brain weight, the Negro brain grows less after puberty than the Caucasian. Though the Negro brain and nervous system mature faster than the Caucasian brain, its development is arrested at an earlier age which limits further intellectual advancement.

The thickness of the supragranular layer (the outside layer) of the Negro brain is about 15 percent thinner, and its convolutions are fewer and more simple, on average, than that of the Caucasian brain.

The frontal lobes of the Negro brain, responsible for abstract conceptional reasoning, are smaller relative to body weight, less fissured, and less complex than those of the Caucasian brain.

Anthropology

The name Homo sapiens was first used by the 18th Century Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus. The word "sapiens" means "wise". The name was originally used to speak of the Caucasian man and synonymous with "European". As a result, many later taxonomists and geneticists believed that Negroes and other races should be classified as different species. In fact, evolutionist Charles Darwin declared in The Descent of Man that the varieties of mankind are so distinct that similar differences found in any other animal would warrant their classification in different species, if not different genera (You could say the same thing about dog breeds, which he does. Also, the differences noted would be called "sub-species". This is also discounting the evidence that all races of humans have THE EXACT SAME DNA).

The Negro skull, in addition to having a smaller brain volume (though it's been proven that brain volume and weight don't correspond to intelligence or mental capacity) and thicker cranial bones than that of the Caucasian, is prognathous; i.e., the lower face projects forward, rather in the manner of an animal's muzzle. In consequence, the Negro jaw is substantially longer, relative to its width, than the Caucasian jaw. A feature of the Negro lower jaw is its retention of a vestige of the "simian shelf," a bony region immediately behind the incisors. The simian shelf is a distinguishing characteristic of apes, and it is absent in Caucasians (no, it's absent in all humans, regardless of race).

The skin of the Negro is thicker and possibly superior to the Caucasian's in the way it impedes the penetration of germs and in its protection from the ultraviolet rays of the sun (It's protective against sunburns because it's darker, not because of thickness. Thickness of skin doesn't impede germs. Plus, wouldn't superior protection against UV rays and infection mean that they're superior?).

The dark color of the Negro is due to melanin pigment which is spread through every layer of the skin and is found even in the muscles and brain (So, their muscles and brain are black? Yeah, that's EXACTLY why the brain is BROWN in color as oppose to pink. They're obviously mixing up melanin and melatonin, a hormone found in the brain to help you sleep).

An African dentist can tell a Negro's tooth from a Caucasian man's at a glance.

Negroes have arms which are longer, relative to body height, than those of Caucasians (The length of one's arms from fingertip to fingertip, unless one has a bone deformity, is the exact same as one's height). This feature, together with their much thicker cranial bones, gives Negro athletes an advantage over Caucasians in boxing (Even though most boxers are Hispanic nowadays). The skeletal and muscular peculiarities of Negroes' lower limbs have given them considerable success as sprinters, but have left them relative undistinguished as distance runners (Which is why Kenya doesn't win gold in marathons EVERY SINGLE OLYMPICS).

FACT #29: ADDITIONAL DIFFERENCES

The hair is black, crispy, and "woolly" in texture, it is flat and elliptical with no central canal or duct like the hair of Europeans.
The nose is thick, broad and flat, often turned up nostrils exposing the red inner lining of the mucous membrane similar to an ape.
The arms and legs of the Negro are relatively longer than the European (They sure love repeating themselves, don't they?). The humerus is a trifle shorter and the forearm longer thereby approximating the simian form (Though in apes, the legs are MUCH shorter than the body and the arms are twice as long as the rest of the body, which is why apes drag their hands).
The eyes are prominent, iris black (GENERALIZATIONS FTW!) and the orbits large. The eye often has a yellowish sclerotic coat over it like that of a gorilla (the whites of gorilla's eyes don't show, nor do any other apes except humans).
The Negro has a shorter trunk the cross-section of the chest is more circular than whites. The pelvis is narrower and longer as it is in an ape.
The mouth is wide with very thick, large and protruding lips (Rhianna?).
Negro skin has a thick superficial horny layer which resists scratching and impedes the penetration of germs (.
The Negro has a larger and shorter neck akin to that of anthropoids.
The cranial sutures are more simple than in the white type and close together earlier.
The ears are roundish, rather small, standing somewhat high and detached thus approaching the simian form.
The Negro is more powerfully developed from the pelvis down and the white more powerfully developed in the chest.
The jaw is larger and stronger and protrudes outward which, along with lower retreating forehead, gives a facial angle of 68 to 70 degrees as opposed to a facial angle of 80 to 82 degrees for Europeans (redundancy is redundant).
The hands and fingers are proportionally narrower and longer. The wrist and ankles are shorter and more robust (I've never heard of someone having "long writsts").
The frontal and paricial bones (a made up bone that when googled, will only show results for Stormfront) of the cranium are less excavated and less capacious. The skull is thicker especially on the sides.
The brain of the Negro on the average is 9 to 20% smaller than whites. (Wonderful redundancy!)
The teeth are larger and are wider apart than in the white race. (This is what braces are for)
The three curvatures of the spine are less pronounced in the Negro than in the white and thus more characteristic of an ape. (Apes can barely walk upright, and when they do, it's only for a few seconds. What separates man from ape is the pelvis shape, not the spine)
The femur of the Negro is less oblique, the tibia (shin bone) more curved and bent forward, the calf of the leg high and but little developed.
The heel is broad and projecting, the foot long and broad but slightly arched causing flat soles (If they have flat feet, then how come they're good at running, like you just said?), the great toe is shorter than in the white.
The two bones proper of the nose are occasionally united, as in apes (Sentence doesn't make any sense).

FACT #30: Blood group studies made during WWII suggest the American Negro gene pool is about 28% white (and many blacks have 30%+ Asian ancestry as well. If it's a combination of supposedly "superior" races, then how come it doesn't cancel out the "inferiority"?). --This despite all manner of institutional discrimination, social segregation, etc. Keep in mind that the results of test from true Black Africans would show even bigger differences from Whites.

Crime

Negroes looting a store in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Looting was widespread in a city whose population was over two-thirds Negro at the time of divine retribution.

The rate at which Negroes commit murder is thirteen times that of Caucasians; Rape and assault, ten times. These figures, as given by the F.B.I. reports, vary somewhat from year to year but fairly represent the trend for the past decade. (This, despite the fact that the criminal profile of a serial killer is WHITE. The worst serial killer in history WAS WHITE)

According to the justice Dept, one in every four Negro males between the ages of 20 and 29 is currently in prison or on probation or parole.

Though only 12.4% of the U.S. population, Negroes commit more than half of all rapes and robberies and 60% of all murders in the U.S. (Gee, maybe because most of them live in the crime-rampant inner city?)

Approximately 50% of all Negro males will be arrested and charged with a serious felony during their lifetime.

A Negro is 56 TIMES more likely to attack a Caucasian person than vice versa (Which is what happens when a white person goes into the hood).

Negro rapists choose Caucasian victims over half (54.9%) of the time, 30X as often as Caucasians choose Negroes.

The annual report from the Department of justice shows that when Caucasians commit violence they do it to Negroes 2.4% of the time. Negroes, on the other hand, choose Caucasian victims MORE THAN HALF the time (More than half? Not very exact).

In New York City, any Caucasian is over 300 TIMES MORE LIKELY to be assaulted by a gang of Negroes than is a Negro by a gang of Caucasians (If he goes into the inner city, yes, duh. If a black guy goes into, say, Fifth Avenue, of course he's not going to be attacked, not to mention the fact that New York City is one of the safest cities nowadays).

Many people argue that high Negro incarceration rates show that police center enforcement at Black crimes and ignore white-collar crimes. However, Negroes commit a disproportionate number of white-collar offenses as well. In 1990, Negroes were nearly three times as likely to be arrested for forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as Caucasians (White collar crime means shit like Enron. I'll be damned to see BET go bankrupt because of corrupt management).

Many people believe that crime is a product of poverty and lack of "advantages." However, the District of Columbia, which enjoys the highest average annual salaries and is second only to Alaska in personal income per capita, leads the nation in just about every category of crime including murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle theft (All of this crime happens IN THE GHETTOS, not the rich parts). D.C. also has the country's strictest gun control, highest police costs per capita, highest ration of police and correctional officers per citizen, and highest rate of incarceration. Its permanent population is over 80% Negroid. West Virginia, which has the nation's lowest crime rate (Actually, New England has the lowest crime rate in the country), suffers from chronic poverty and has the highest unemployment (Highest unemployment rate is in Michigan, obviously in Detroit, which is mostly black) in the U.S. It also has the fewest police per capita (Maybe they have the fewest police because of the poverty, so they can't PAY for police). West Virginia is over 96% Caucasian (Partially because of incest, and partially because any black person within state lines would likely be lynched).